“This isn’t a default or foreclosure situation,” [Morgan Stanley spokesmodel Melody] Barnes said. “We are going to give them the properties to get out of the loan obligation.”
Next up: Dubai sends Dubai World to debtor's prison.
“This isn’t a default or foreclosure situation,” [Morgan Stanley spokesmodel Melody] Barnes said. “We are going to give them the properties to get out of the loan obligation.”
Next up: Dubai sends Dubai World to debtor's prison.
A klein bottle:
“From the archives: how to fix a liquidity crisis (13 Dec ‘07)”—that is, in 2007—quoted the FT as saying:
The latest Fed flow of funds data shows that FHLBs [Federal Home Loan Banks, "a little-known network of government-sponsored bank co-operatives founded during the Great Depression"] issued new loans at an unprecedented annualised rate of $746bn (EU508bn, UKP366bn) in the third quarter, up from practically nothing in the second quarter.
Where’d they get the money? MBSes. Sunlight Projects:
The problem is that over the last few years, some of the FHLBs invested heavily in private mortgage-backed securities—the same types of investments that lost much of their value during the housing crisis. The FHLBs invested in very few securities backed by subprime loans—the so-called toxic assets we’ve heard so much about of late. Nonetheless, the values of some of the FHLB investments have plunged—and fast. In the space of just two months, for example, the ratings of about $1.4 billion of the Seattle bank’s investments were downgraded from AAA to junk status. That doesn’t mean they’re now worthless, but it certainly increases the chances that they won’t recover their full value. What’s more, the Seattle bank was only holding about $1.7 billion in capital on December 31, 2008; that capital is meant to protect it against losses.
Better still:
Because the banks believe these losses are temporary, they don’t have to be recognized on their accounting statements. [...] Home loan bank representatives say the setbacks are merely temporary because they intend to hold the securities to maturity. By then, they predict, the economy will have improved and these holdings will have recovered their value.
Go team.
See also: “No one saw it coming (Citibank edition).”
This raises the obvious question, if the banks are in such good shape, why not take away the training wheels and let them fend for themselves in the market?
Training wheels.
Douglas Leech, founder and CEO of Centra Bank, a WV bank that took money from the gubmint then returned it when the gubmint imposed new conditions:
“What they did is wrong and fundamentally un-American,” he said. “Even though the government told us to take this money to increase our lending, the extra charge meant we had less money to lend. It was the equivalent of a penalty for early withdrawal.”
The equivalent of a penalty for early withdrawal from... a bank account!
(nyt)
(By the way, the buzz is that some banks may participate in the bailout scheme, borrowing money from the gov to buy their own bad assets at ridiculously inflated prices. That renders them technically solvent, with Washington holding the bag. Nice.)
Gangster.
Soros: “We witnessed the collapse of the financial system. It was placed on life support, and it's still on life support. There's no sign that we are anywhere near a bottom.”
What do you will we get when you cross “bad banks” with countries that are too small to bail out their financial sectors? Bad nations.
Fareed Zakaria in Newsweek (“Worthwhile Canadian Initiative,” 7 Feb ’09):
Canadian banks are typically leveraged at 18 to 1—compared with U.S. banks at 26 to 1 and European banks at a frightening 61 to 1.
(drum)
Alloway, “Spot of Swiss,” FT (12 Nov ’08):
They’ve no doubt sorted this out in the last eighty days.
See also: “Swiss miss.”